Oh Yes, We’re “Going There”: Ted Cruz Pronounces Trump Won’t Win The GOP Nomination – Does His Confidence Come From His Possibly Being A Stealth Candidate For Those Sneaky Globalists?

Written by Karen Colasinski for Media Mass Deception


GOP Candidate Ted Cruz seems to be making an initial move against Donald Trump as of this week (see Ted Cruz Sees Donald Trump’s Fan Base Coming His Way. To hear what Cruz said about Trump not winning, go here: https://soundcloud.com/wabc-rita-cosby/ted-cruz-interviewed-by-wabc-radio-host-rita-cosby-100815). I know there are many Cruz supporters. I don’t happen to be one of them. I hope those of you who are thinking a Trump/Cruz ticket might consider this compilation of Cruz info. It feels to me that Cruz is committing his own form of Taqiyya by acting the Constitutionalist while being a stealth candidate for the globalists. (Interesting to note that, unlike most conservative candidates, Ted Cruz was FOR Obamatrade / TPA / until recently, before suddenly reneging his support. Hmmmm…  http://bit.ly/1N5K8UH)

His wife, Heidi, was a managing director for Goldman Sachs until 2011 and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. The same Goldman Sachs that’s entrenched in nearly all things financial, including causes of the Bush’s and Clinton’s. And that includes the George Soros’ “Center for American Progress” – Read ‘A Pit of Vipers; also, his wife’ http://politi.co/1VLcJWB

If Heidi Cruz has had a change of heart about any of the activities of these associations she should AT LEAST have the integrity and courage to address the public’s concerns. And Ted Cruz needs to DENOUNCE every single element of support he’s given in the past to ANYTHING turning the US into a “part of a North American Union”. Read more about Heidi Cruz’s globalist connections, here: http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/ted-cruz-again-battles-globalist-charge-against-wife/ and Ted Cruz’s excuses about it all here: http://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-smith/2011/10/a-pit-of-vipers-also-his-wife-040327

That said – why the hell is a SUPER PAC tied to HIM giving FIORINA $500K?!

And then there’s the issue of eligibility. Sigh. I KNOW it needs to work its way openly through the legal system like wasn’t allowed with Obama. But BOTH Cruz and Obama were born to American mothers and NON-American fathers. Obama’s would’ve stayed here at least for awhile had his school visa renewal not been rejected and he had to go home. Cruz’s dad didn’t bother to become a US citizen until 2005.

Doesn’t that make both Cruz and Obama “anchor babies”?

Legal scholars have different views of the Constitutional intent but any related court cases that have set precedent refer to PARENTS in the plural. My point mainly is that IF Cruz were to be even a VP candidate what kind of chaos could be caused if it’s not settled? Does anyone think for a minute the Dems are going to have heard the hollering about Obama all these years but let a GOP candidate get a free pass on it?

Source links for what I’ve said above:


Don’t look at Goldman Sachs map unless you have a pot of coffee ready or a bottle of something:








Megyn Kelly – WRONG AGAIN – Blacks and Asians Prefer Trump, Too – Not Just “Uneducated Whites” – THHHHHHPPPPPT!

So, Megyn Kelly over at Fox blathered and “opined” that “only uneducated white males” like Donald Trump. Well, Megyn – Blacks and Asians apparently like Trump, too – Along with leftie (former) liberal professors – like me! (thhhhhhppppppt) – Don Light @Pros4Trump


The New York Times Promotes Data Suggesting Trump / Sanders Are #3 Presidential Picks – Check The Methodology, Seem Sketchy To You?

By Don Light  @Pros4Trump

“I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore, Toto”. Welcome to George Orwell’s ‘1984’, Dorothy. Check this out: The New York Times is promoting the idea that anti-Establishment candidates Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are the #3 Presidential picks in their respective parties for the 2016 Presidential race; trouble is, this assertion is based on EXTREMELY sketchy data. See for yourself via link, below. For example, one of the categories they are using to pick the “winner” of the Presidential race is “money raised”. Now we all know that Trump is funding his own campaign, so of course, he comes in dead last in this particular category behind all the other GOP candidates, at #12, which causes him to plummet below other, lesser candidates. Who cares that he is #1 in the Iowa and N.H. polls?

Seems to me like this is just another example of the MSM doing all they can to promote candidates on both sides of the aisle who will ensure “business as usual” continues in DC if elected to the Presidency in 2016 (Hillary Clinton / Jeb Bush). Notice that this same shady methodology places Bernie Sanders under BIDEN (who they describe as “unannounced”). To present the information in this way appears to be yet another attempt on mainstream media’s part to mislead the public with faulty methodology by illustrating Trump and Sanders supposed #3 positions as Presidential candidates. Or perhaps even deliberate manipulation of data in an attempt to promote the idea that Trump / Sanders cannot possibly win their respective party nominations or the general election in 2016. Or both. Or, perhaps something even worse: The deliberate dissemination of Propaganda coordinated carefully by Establishment media designed to control the masses and ensure that anti-Establishment candidates like Trump and Sanders do not become the next POTUS in 2016. Ya think?

-Don Light / Founder of MMD

****Who’s Winning the Presidential Campaign? History suggests that each party’s eventual nominee will emerge from 2015 in one of the top two or three positions, as measured by endorsements, fund-raising and polling….[see below link for the full story.]